OpenAI completed a $7 billion internal share buyback the same week COO Brad Lightcap and CRO Denise Dresser both exited the company. Dresser lasted eight months. She likely walked away from tens of millions in unvested stock options, which is not a decision people make casually when an IPO is on the horizon.
The IPO itself is less certain than it looks. The New York Times reported in late June that OpenAI was leaning toward going public in 2027. Meanwhile, Anthropic's investors are leaking $2 trillion valuation figures to the Financial Times and $190 to $200 billion revenue projections to Reuters, numbers based not on current performance but on a theoretical future where training costs shrink and margins expand. Reuters framed this as standard analysis. It is not. 'Current EBITDA does not fully capture the economics investors expect at scale' is not a neutral observation. It is a request to ignore the actual business in favor of an imaginary one.
The full piece works through why Anthropic's pre-IPO media campaign reads as desperate, what Dresser's departure signals about internal confidence, and what it means for the broader AI market if OpenAI's survival is genuinely in question. The argument is not that OpenAI will fail. It is that the conditions for failure are more concrete than anyone covering this beat is willing to say plainly.
[READ ORIGINAL →]