Anthropic's Fable project is drawing skepticism, and the administration's read on it is probably wrong. That mistake belongs to Anthropic, not its critics.
Three separate storylines converge in this piece: Anthropic's internal positioning around Fable, the persistent and unsolved problem of jailbreaking large language models, and SpaceX's reported acquisition of Cursor, the AI-native code editor. Each thread carries real consequences for how AI is built, distributed, and controlled in 2025.
The jailbreak section alone is worth the full read. It does not offer a solution. It maps the structural reasons why one may not exist, which is a more honest and useful contribution than most coverage on the topic.
[READ ORIGINAL →]