Some startup competitions end not through attrition but through a single decisive move. Elad Gil catalogs five categories: merging with your main competitor, buying a key supplier, locking in a king-making distribution deal, destroying an incumbent's cash cow, and deploying massive capital to saturate a network. The examples are concrete. X.com merged with PayPal to consolidate internet payments in the 1990s. IBM distributing Microsoft's early OS and Yahoo distributing Google were both distribution deals that shaped trillion-dollar outcomes. TikTok bought traffic at scale. Top LLM labs are raising tens of billions to entrench an oligopoly before competitors can close the gap.
The mechanics matter as much as the strategy. Private-to-private mergers between fierce competitors fail most often on three points: post-merger ownership split, leadership control, and founder grudges. Regulatory clearance is easier when both companies are still private, but ego kills more of these deals than antitrust does. Gil also flags Google's search-and-ads cash cow as a live example of the destruction playbook, with generative AI products threatening to erode the revenue base that funds everything else at Alphabet.
The full piece is worth reading for the framing Gil builds around creative scenario planning. The point is not that these moves are always executable. It is that stress-testing them forces founders to think clearly about M&A, partnerships, and strategic hires they would otherwise ignore. The footnotes alone, especially on why private mergers collapse, compress years of hard-won operator experience into two sentences.
[READ ORIGINAL →]