ArXiv is banning researchers for one year if their submitted papers contain incontrovertible evidence of unchecked LLM output, including hallucinated references or raw meta-comments left by the model.
The policy was detailed by Thomas Dietterich, ArXiv's computer science section chair, on X. The penalty goes beyond the ban: future submissions from offenders must be accepted at a reputable peer-reviewed venue before ArXiv will consider them.
The specific triggers matter here, not just the headline. Read the original for Dietterich's exact language on what counts as incontrovertible evidence, which is the line ArXiv is drawing between AI-assisted work and AI slop.
[READ ORIGINAL →]