The argument is simple: prompting an AI is not thinking. The output arrives fully formed, which means your brain skipped the part that matters, the struggle, the iteration, the dead ends that produce original thought.
The piece targets a specific failure mode. Writers and designers who use AI for ideation are not accelerating creativity, they are outsourcing it. The discard rate of AI output is high not because the output is bad, but because it was never yours to begin with. That gap is where skill atrophies.
Worth reading for one reason: it reframes AI as a cognitive liability, not just a productivity tool. If you use these systems daily and have not thought seriously about what you are trading away, this is the article that forces that accounting.
[READ ORIGINAL →]